Thursday, March 28, 2013

WebQuest Evaluation

Within my course I have been asked to evaluate a webquest. It is amazing how easy they are to find, but they are not always very effective. Here are my thoughts on the webquest I found.



    The webquest March Madness is an interdisciplinary webquest.  This webquest is designed for 8th grade students. It appears that the educational goals depend on the role of each student within the project. There are four roles and they include the statistician, the athletic director, public relations director, and athletic coach. Within these roles each student has their own role in “their” basketball team making it into the March Madness tournament.  The overall goals for the students is to be able to use technology to research various real life scenarios such as finding airports and creating travel plans, finding statistics, using a word processing program, and making predictions. Once the students have found all of the information asked for the students are asked to compile their results and create a group poster.
The webquest lists several curriculum standards addressed within this webquest. These standards include the following:

  • CA - 1 Speaking and writing standard English (including grammar, usage, punctuation, spelling, capitalization)
  • CA - Comprehending and evaluating the content and artistic aspects of oral and visual presentations
  • Math -1 Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division; other number sense, including numeration and estimation; and the application of these operations and concepts in the workplace and other situations
  • Math - 3 Data analysis, probability and statistics
  • Social Studies - 5 The major elements of geographical study and analysis (such as location, place, movement, regions)


I do not believe these standards really match up to the task of the webquest. I agree the students will be using the CA standards by working within groups and designing a poster that includes the written word. However, the other standards have a very limited connection. The math standards are barely examined by the students. The only role that includes using mathematics in depth is the athletic director that has to find the total cost of traveling. The statistician merely finds already solved statistics, but does not use them for any sort of synthesizing. Finally, the assistant coach merely adds up positive integers, but in an applied manner. The social studies standards are also limited to two roles and only include finding the location of places. There is no study of regions or movement. Overall, I feel the majority of this project based on the ability to use technology processes such as navigating the world wide web and using programs to compile information. However, there were no technology standards included.
    Throughout this website there are several strategies used to have students work collaboratively. Each student has their own role and evaluated in their own ways, but is also evaluated on being able to bring their information back to the group to create a final project. With this incorporated into the evaluation I believe this would be an effective group project. The webquest gives the idea that the students really are in this situation and need to apply their skills to make it successful. Although students are working independently through this project, the teaching is deductive. The students are stepped through each stage of the project and given the links needed to solve.
    This webquest incorporates the use of finding information through the world wide web and using word processing programs to display information. The use of the web makes the project much easier to find the information as a student. Most of the project could be completed by printing out information, but then all the students would be doing is copying information from one spot to another to create a poster. Most of the upper level thinking of this project is being able to find the information, but like I have previously stated, there are no standards that include the use of technology or the ability to research.
    This website has a few broken links, but the majority work. The few links that are broken are posted to direct students toward information. However, I believe the students would be able to find the information fairly easily at an eighth grade level. It also directs students to fill in tables, but the tables are unable to be filled in. The students would need further direction on how to create the table in another place such as a word processing program. Although, some information is broken the webquest is not out of date. The website includes a theme that happens annually that many students (and grown-ups) have a large interest in. Although the data changes annually, the concepts stay the same and can always be used.
    The webquest includes a credits page where it gives credit to the person who helped organize it. It also includes the program that allowed the funding to have it created.
    Although this webquest looks like it could be a lot of fun for the students, there are many improvements that could be made to it. The first change that I think needs to be made is a clearer focus on what the students should be learning. Each student has completely different tasks that includes different standards. Either the information should stay the same and there should be a greater emphasis on technology standards or there should be a stronger connection to the standards in each discipline. If the emphasis was on technology the students could be taught how to compile their information using technology programs such as creating a website or using online resources such as Prezi or Glogster. If the idea was to make a stronger connection to the standards listed I would have students find information to create statistics such as mean, median, mode and create visual representations such as a box-and-whisker plot for their posters. The student with the role of predictions could figure out their theoretical probabilities and then throughout the tournament find their experimental probability. The geography could be included within each task by having each student create some form of map to relate to the information.
Overall, I think the creator of this website wanted to incorporate the theme and loosely connected standards. The project has a lot of potential, but needs a stronger emphasis on technology or core standards.  

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Math Homework Hotline (Merlot Lab)

There are many times that my students need help with common misconceptions or  just remembering the steps to solving problems. This website allows students to find a resource that explains the process to math problems verbally and visually for a student that may not have access to someone for help.

Math Homework Hotline
Math Homework Hotline Direct Link  (Skipping Merlot)
Quality of Content:

  1. Does the software present valid (correct) concepts, models, and skills? 
    Yes. This software shows videos of common problem areas in mathematics with examples of how to solve them correctly.

  2. Does the software present educationally significant concepts, models, and skills for the discipline?
     Yes. This software shows videos of common problem areas in mathematics with examples of how to solve them correctly. The videos show a person solving the problems with step by step directions.

Potential Effectiveness as a Teaching-Learning Tool:

  1. What stage(s) in the learning process/cycle could the materials be used?
    1. Explanation or description of the topic/stating the problem
      The videos clearly show a list of commonly mistaken problems.
    2. Demonstration of the curriculum/exploration of the problem
      The videos show step-by-step instruction.
    3. Practice using the curriculum/analysis of the outcomes from solving the problem
      This could be used as an extra resource for students to revisit while completing practice problems when away from the teacher. 
  2. What is(are) the learning objective(s)? What should students be able to do after successfully learning with the materials?
    The objective of this website is to give students a resource to see step by step instructions on how to solve commonly mistaken math problems. The students should be able to solve problems they are having difficulty with, when they need an explanation of how.
  3. What are the characteristics of the target learner(s)
    This resource is targeted toward middle level mathematics ranging from 6th grade material through geometry.
  4. Does the interactive/media-rich presentation of material improve faculty and students' abilities to teach and learn the materials?
    Yes. It allows the students to have an added resource of explanation outside of the classroom.
  5. Can the use of the software be readily integrated into current curriculum and pedagogy within the discipline?
    The content could be used an alternative way of describing material. However, it may be unnecessary since the videos only show line by line solutions, with very little pictures or manipulatives. 
  6. Can the software be used in a variety of ways to achieve teaching and learning goals?
    Yes the website offers instructional videos for many objectives. However, the use of these videos are limited to deductive instructional strategies.

  7. Are the teaching-learning goals easy to identify?
    Yes. The learning goals change by the topics listed. 

  8. Can good learning assignments for using the software application be written easily?
    Yes. A teacher could easily create worksheets and activities that the students could use to practice the math skills explained or to extend the activities to the next level. 
Ease of Use:

  1. Are the labels, buttons, menus, text, and general layout of the computer interface consistent and visually distinct?
    Yes. This website is very easy to navigate.
  2. Does the user get trapped in the material?
    No.
  3. Can the user get lost easily in the material?
    No. The website is simple and straight to the point.
  4. Does the module provide feedback about the system status and the user's responses?
    No.
  5. Does the module provide appropriate flexibility in its use?
    No.
  6. Does the learning material require a lot of documentation, technical support, and/or instruction for most students to successfully use the software?
    No. The website only requires a computer with internet connection.
  7. Does the material present information in ways that are familiar for students?
    Yes. The website provides a lecture based format that are short in length and provide explanations with examples, similar to the majority of classrooms.
  8. Does the material present information in ways that would be attractive to students?
    Yes. The website used bright colors and a cartoon character to gain the students attention.

Friday, March 15, 2013

About Me:
High Schools Attended: Hillsdale High School and Quincy High School
College Attended: Central Michigan University Undergrad, Michigan State University Grad School
Degrees: Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education, working towards a Master's in Curriculum and Instruction
Majors: Mathematics and Social Studies
Minor: Middle Level Education
Pets: Brittany puppy named Swish
Hobbies: Enjoying the lake, reading, and athletics